Your point was shite because you didn't say that. You said it was normal news at 1100.
I wrote "escalation continues". Not "normal". The "film at 11" quip indicates something that the speaker/writer doesn't find to be unusual.
I don't find it unusual. Hodgkinson shooting. Attack on Rand Paul. Indifference to harassment of politicians ("part of the process") and USSC justices contributes to normalization (acceptance, indifference, tolerance, etc) of behaviours. It shouldn't be hard to grasp that I'm not in favour of this normalization; I'm observing that it happens. "Broken windows". As I wrote, people should learn from this. Not sure how you managed to leap from that to assuming I condone it.
[Add: maybe I'm asking too much. I wrote: "They ought to sh!tcan their passive "will no-one rid me of this turbulent priest" rhetoric - all politicians, all commentators, all celebrities, everyone with any kind of name recognition. Every level of harassment tolerated is normalized and invites the next escalation.", and that was unclear? Let me try this: "People ought to stop goading others to violence. Tolerance invites escalation."]
I'm not sure there's much of a political angle here; whatever passes for "facts" about the event are in flux. I suppose we're going to learn there's a mental/emotional instability factor.