• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Army.ca call to action - Enabling prospective recruits to search

McG

Army.ca Legend
Reaction score
302
Points
880
The site's recruiting wiki is in a pretty poor state.  No narrative to guide visitors, and a small shopping list of links to other hollow wiki pages.
http://army.ca/wiki/index.php/Recruiting

Now, the CAF recruiting has a pretty decent site and we do not need to emulate that here.  But, people come here looking for a different perspective.  We can do that.  And I would like to call on all site members to contribute one simple step in that direction.  Go visit the occupation pages; if your occupation is not there then create it, and if your occupation is there then flesh it out.

http://army.ca/wiki/index.php/Category:Non-Commissioned_Occupations
http://army.ca/wiki/index.php/Category:Officer_Occupations

It is a simple step to which everyone can contribute, and it becomes a first point of reference when somebody new comes to this site with questions.

 

McG

Army.ca Legend
Reaction score
302
Points
880
To make it easier for those who don't do wiki code, just look for your occupation here:  http://army.ca/wiki/index.php/Military_Occupation#Non-Commissioned_Member_Occupations

If you do not see it, then edit it into the list between two square brackets as such:
*[[Occupation Name]]

After saving your edit, there will be a new link that will allow you to create a page about your occupation.
 

ModlrMike

Army.ca Veteran
Subscriber
Donor
Reaction score
568
Points
960
Would it be helpful to split the occupations into Reg and Res as they often have different progression pathways? In addition, some occupations are RegF only, so that should be stated early on in the description.
 

McG

Army.ca Legend
Reaction score
302
Points
880
I think there is enough overlap that paired Reg F and PRes occupations could be described on the same page, but separate sections should be created on each page to describe any differences.  Separate pages would largely mirror each other and it becomes twice the work to maintain.

... but if we are successful in just getting one page per occupation, then I suppose the next bound could be to split Reg F and PRes occupations.
 

ballz

Army.ca Veteran
Subscriber
Reaction score
274
Points
910
I was going to write some stuff for the Infantry Officer page but realized I was maybe taking too much initiative in creating headings / etc.

What kind of stuff are we going to write about on here? Should we standardize some major headings / sub-headings?

I think a big part of most of the potential recruits want to know about are the "lifestyle" type stuff, so as much as we can write about career progression, salary, job description, etc, we should have something in there about pro's and con's of day-to-day living in x occupation.

For major headings / sub-headings I would think...

Job Description including salary

Training Progression

Baseline Employment

Career Progression / Opportunities after Baseline Employment up to promotion to Major.

Day-to-day life
-Summary
-Pros
-Cons

Am I good to go ahead and start blurbing away with those?
 

McG

Army.ca Legend
Reaction score
302
Points
880
ballz said:
Am I good to go ahead and start blurbing away with those? 
Absolutely.  I have also added a heading for Specialty Qualifications to a few of the existing occupations.
 

McG

Army.ca Legend
Reaction score
302
Points
880
balls,
Good start on the infantry office page.  I have added some code to create a few page links, and a headings structure that automatically populates a contents section at the top of the page.  You will be able to see the code and make use of it yourself when you edit the page again.

 

dimsum

Army.ca Fixture
Mentor
Reaction score
1,472
Points
940
Any way that we can link pages to the main wiki page instead of just the army.ca one?
 

ballz

Army.ca Veteran
Subscriber
Reaction score
274
Points
910
MCG said:
balls,
Good start on the infantry office page.  I have added some code to create a few page links, and a headings structure that automatically populates a contents section at the top of the page.  You will be able to see the code and make use of it yourself when you edit the page again.

Nice. Looks a lot better now.
 

McG

Army.ca Legend
Reaction score
302
Points
880
We are making some progress, but there are a lot of occupations that still have no information:  http://army.ca/wiki/index.php/Military_Occupation

Take a moment to update or create your occupation's page on the site wiki.  Just click HERE and then click on your occupation title.  It will be better for your intelligence that time spent following the US election.
 

Mike Bobbitt

Administrator
Staff member
Owner
Directing Staff
Reaction score
93
Points
960
Excellent work all, thanks for taking the time to make this site better!


Cheers
Mike
 

ModlrMike

Army.ca Veteran
Subscriber
Donor
Reaction score
568
Points
960
Have we settled on a standardized format, or are we just going to try and keep the pages looking similar?

I do like the format we have now:

Job Description and Salary
Training Progression
Career Progression
Day-to-day Life

Perhaps we can take the Salary piece out as it may differ depending on one's entry plan. As well, the information is readily available on the Recruiting website
 

dimsum

Army.ca Fixture
Mentor
Reaction score
1,472
Points
940
ModlrMike said:
Have we settled on a standardized format, or are we just going to try and keep the pages looking similar?

I do like the format we have now:

Job Description and Salary
Training Progression
Career Progression
Day-to-day Life

Perhaps we can take the Salary piece out as it may differ depending on one's entry plan. As well, the information is readily available on the Recruiting website

I agree that Salary could be taken out, and maybe some stuff from training if it's already in the CAF recruiting site.
 

NavyHopeful

Member
Reaction score
1
Points
230
I put the link to the forces pay scale for salary, but added the blurb about Sea Pay.  The forces recruiting site makes no mention of Sea/Field/Aircrew pay.  Also, the recruiting site shows the estimated salary of a FULLY TRAINED member (ie QL5 or CPL/LS).  I have seen some people asking about pay not realizing that the actual starting salary as a recruit is roughly $30,000/year.

As for the training portion, I tried to go a little more in-depth for W Eng Tech than the recruiting site goes into.  It touches briefly on the QL3 stuff and hits the NETP and BMQ portions, but for the way the W Eng training is broken down, I tried to give as much info as I could, without breaking any rules re: security/safety, etc.

Whichever way you folks want to go with the wiki pages, let me know.  I'll be happy to amend W Eng to reflect the standard.

Cheers.

Rev
 

McG

Army.ca Legend
Reaction score
302
Points
880
I don't know that uniformity is required, but if there is a structure people like they can apply it to other occupations.
 

Eye In The Sky

Army.ca Fixture
Reaction score
425
Points
910
While I am tied up for the next few days or so, I'll come back to this very soon and flesh out some stuff for AES Op.
 

PuckChaser

Moderator
Staff member
Directing Staff
Mentor
Reaction score
653
Points
1,060
Started on ACISS. Lets go Jimmys, we should have the best page on here...
 

ModlrMike

Army.ca Veteran
Subscriber
Donor
Reaction score
568
Points
960
Some headway made on Logistics Officer. Other LogOs please wade in where appropriate.
 
Top