Search results

So for the Left Coast folks that would be live by the Coast, die by the coast…

DCO. I’m pretty sure the Empires NCO corps is fairly weak. Look at their marksmanship;)

Well several of the then presiding USSC justices and Jane Wade later admitted she wished the case hadn’t gone that way and regretted her decision. I don’t think anyone on either side of the Abortion issue down here thought it was truly settled, in the same way that most folks on the gun issue...

Please take California too…

Honestly Canada should probably approach the US and say, ‘hey, we can field a Bde in Latvia - if you give us equipment for an ABCT, and we will give 1 CMBG equipment to Ukraine. It’s a big win, win, win, Ukraine gets equipment, Canada gets a credible Bde and we don’t need to send more troops.

I'd argue it is an illusion of Executive Authority - that has been illegitimately propped up by both sides usage of it.

There is no real executive authority here, outside what is given by Congress. Nothing gives the President authority for Executive Orders. The Presidents job is to sign bills into law. The theory behind EO’s is that they are just streamlining the system, but that only works if it was...

So I’ll be hoping for a April to July eruption, as October is a bad month for me.

I give him less credit than my left shoe… He’s a weak person by his very nature, which is why I don’t see him arguing against it. NATO has said ‘okay Canada, we need your commitment’ and he’s going to demurely default to “okay” and ‘CDS make it happen’ so any blame then gets punted downstream...

No, but we probably shouldn’t have stopped going West in Germany…

He really doesn’t have a choice. Canada’s’Heavy Bde’ commitment to NATO has been called up.

More civilian targets deliberately struck. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russian-missiles-hit-crowded-shopping-mall-central-ukraine-zelenskiy-2022-06-27/

I strongly believe Canada will have a Bde over soon. I think at this point even your PM sees the clouds of war coming closer.

Rights beget responsibilities, and rights end when they infringe others rights. You can’t shout Fire in a crowded theatre (well you can, but it’s not protected under free speech).

The point is that isn’t not the Government’s role to stop that. They are free to ignore it - or so their own thing.

@Skysix this thread is a pretty good place.

That is part of the current MDO doctrine and DHS mandate down here.

Let’s look at the First Amendment shall we. ;) Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for...

Or 6 months ago ;) I think we got sucked into the wrong thread for this though.

I got your point. I was just adding personal information to the what, why, where. I’m a big fan of the current court - morally I agree with the overturning of Roe v. Wade, but more importantly to me from a rights aspect I think that the current court is going to ensure that both the States...