I got a transcript of the Vance interview, and calculated how much of the 20 minutes ended up in the follow-up stories mentioned above. The magic number, based on word count:
2 per cent
Impressive, eh?
Something you may want to keep in mind when you read stories based on "Bloggins made the statement during an interview with ABCD news."
A bit more here.
At the beginning of the first Gulf War, I was interviewed (with the CO's approval) by a local television station. I had recently returned from Iran and Iraq (deployed with UNIIMOG - not the war), and was the closest thing they could find to someone with "recent experience" in the area.
The interview went fine, took about 10 minutes - I actually had a good time, felt that I had put my point of view across fairly well, and that I had "connected" with the interviewer.
When I saw the TEN SECONDS of the interview that was actually aired, I couldn't believe it. I came across as a war monger (which I certainly WAS - but I hadn't expressed that in the interview), and basically a "knuckle dragger lookin' to give someone a good kickin' ". Not at all what had taken place during the interview itself. Some "creative" editing was involved.
Use caution when approached by the media. The PAFFO folks are, in my experience, MUCH more switched now on than they were back then - and should usually be able to alleviate this kind of thing. Don't do an interview without one at your side.