Author Topic: FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities  (Read 150923 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline blogwatcher

  • Guest
  • *
  • 30
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 3
Re: FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities
« Reply #825 on: June 12, 2009, 14:17:53 »
Sigh....

A big thank you to the Canadian companies that want to get a piece of the big pie with their inferior products.

FWIW - the SOR is based on a 1/3 Buffalo and 2/3 Hercules requirement.  Most SAR dogs would state that the only real replacement for FWSAR is the J Model Herc.  We are already comprising by downgrading to a twin engine aircraft.

Actually, the C-27J has far better agility than the C-130J which is why it it makes a better plane for FWSAR. The flight capabilities of the C-27J match the current C-130s in use, so there is no "downgrade" at all. 

Offline Zoomie

  • Established 1998
  • Mentor
  • Milnet.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 14,682
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 1,880
  • I routinely step in it, but like conflict...
Re: FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities
« Reply #826 on: June 12, 2009, 17:25:29 »
Actually, the C-27J has far better agility than the C-130J which is why it it makes a better plane for FWSAR.

I'm interested to read what you think we do while flying SAR?  Are you envisioning us doing barrel rolls and 90 degree bank angle turns?

We need a robust platform with speed, range and payload.  If you pit the Jerc against the 27J, the Jerc will always win.

Offline GAP

  • Semper Fi
  • Milnet.ca Subscriber
  • Milnet.ca Legend
  • *
  • 114,380
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 10,268
Re: FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities
« Reply #827 on: July 20, 2009, 16:48:17 »
Today's DID review of the tendering, RFP, etc

Rescue Required: Canada’s Search-And-Rescue Aircraft Program
19-Jul-2009 17:09 EDT
Article Link

The USA isn’t the only country whose SAR aircraft program is having a hard go of it lately. In 2004, Canada announced a program to replace its aging DHC-5 (CC-115) Buffalo (West Coast) and CC-130E/H Hercules (East Coast) search-and-rescue planes with at least 15 new aircraft. Some of the Canadian Forces’ CC-130s have already been grounded after flying 40,000 – 50,000 hours, and a contract has been signed for C-130J replacements.

The first SAR aircraft was to be delivered in 2006, with all deliveries complete by 2009. The competitors were a familiar duo: the Alenia C-27J Spartan with its speed advantage and C-130J compatibility, vs. the EADS-CASA C-295M with its longer fuselage and lower operating costs. The competition was put on hold, but 2009 looks set bring in a new C$ 3 billion RFP, with new competitors added to the mix. Or will it be a fixed single-choice process instead, per media reports?

Further reports indicate it may be a 3rd option: a rigged process, designed to look like a contest. The latest “Industry Day” did little to quell those suspicions, as the program was formally re-launched…

Canada is the 2nd-largest country in the world in terms of square area. Its 9,976 km3 exceeds both China (9,596 km3) and the USA (9,363 km3), and 3 ocean borders to the east, west and north expand its required coverage into large and hostile environments. Each year, the JRCCs handle an average of 8,000 air and marine SAR cases, and Canadian Forces SAR aircraft conduct over 1,000 missions per year. In 2008, the JRCC handled 9,097 SAR cases across Canada.

Canadian Joint Rescue Coordination Centres (JRCC) are staffed by a combination of coast Guard and Canadian Forces personnel, and are currently located in Halifax, NS; Trenton, ON; and Victoria BC. The SAR crews and aircraft are based in Gander, NL (EH-101 derivative CH-149 Cormorant helicopters); Greenwood, NS (CH-149 Cormorant helicopters and C-130E/H “CC-130” Hercules aircraft); Trenton, ON (Bell 412 derivative CH-146 Griffon helicopters and CC-130 Hercules aircraft); Winnipeg, MB (CC-130 Hercules aircraft); and Comox, BC (CH-149 Cormorant helicopters and DHC-5/ CC-115 Buffalo fixed-wing aircraft).

These are supplemented as required by Canadian Forces’ zGriffon helicopters in Goose Bay, Labrador, NL; Bagotville, QC; and Cold Lake, AB; and by a small arctic fleet of DHC-6/ CC-138 Twin Otter aircraft based in Yellowknife, NWT.
More on link
 
REMEMBER SOME PEOPLE ARE ALIVE SIMPLY BECAUSE IT IS ILLEGAL TO SHOOT THEM

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I´m not so sure about the universe

Offline ezbeatz

  • Guest
  • *
  • -100
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 13
Re: FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities
« Reply #828 on: August 10, 2009, 20:48:34 »
We need a robust platform with speed, range and payload.  If you pit the Jerc against the 27J, the Jerc will always win.

Ya, but is a government going to purchase 17 Hercs just so they park them on a tarmac for SAR standby? There's an economic reality involved. Guaranteed if the Herc was purchased for SAR that it would spend most of the time in a transport role. Heck, the reason the C-27J was pushed was that it too could be used for tactical transport to support the Herc fleet.

Offline Good2Golf

  • Directing Staff
  • Milnet.ca Fixture
  • *
  • 60,494
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 5,264
  • Dammit! I lost my sand-wedge on that last jump!
Re: FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities
« Reply #829 on: August 10, 2009, 21:29:05 »
Ya, but is a government going to purchase 17 Hercs just so they park them on a tarmac for SAR standby? There's an economic reality involved. Guaranteed if the Herc was purchased for SAR that it would spend most of the time in a transport role. Heck, the reason the C-27J was pushed was that it too could be used for tactical transport to support the Herc fleet.

ezbeatz, please stop.  This is talk that has no basis of accuracy or truth.  Why do you think that assets procured for SAR would spend most of their time in transport?  What would the new transport fleet that was sized appropriately to conduct all the required transport roles then be doing?  Is there information you know about the FWSAR program that the FWSAR project staff don't know about?

G2G


*edit for spelling*
« Last Edit: August 11, 2009, 22:34:11 by Good2Golf »

Offline Zoomie

  • Established 1998
  • Mentor
  • Milnet.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 14,682
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 1,880
  • I routinely step in it, but like conflict...
Re: FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities
« Reply #830 on: August 11, 2009, 14:45:00 »
Heck, the reason the C-27J was pushed was that it too could be used for tactical transport to support the Herc fleet.

Maybe strategic lift (STRAT) but in no way with FWSAR be used in a TAL role.

15 aircraft over 4 FWSAR MOB's = Primary and Secondary SAR aircraft (2x4=8) with 7 airframes left over for STRAT, maintenance and training.

Offline Loachman

  • Army Pilot in Drag
  • Directing Staff
  • Milnet.ca Veteran
  • *
  • 49,112
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 3,350
Re: FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities
« Reply #831 on: August 11, 2009, 22:00:24 »
ezbeatz hasn't done anything wrong I have read all 5 of the guys post and don't see any thing wrong with them .

There are now more than five, and I, too, find them annoying.

We have reduced tolerance to this because we have seen it before, and will see it again.

If you dont like  his opinion fine but there is other ways of responding to it than the above .

Yes, but, in truth, I am not far behind my colleague in "ways of responding".

Like in response you can with all your experience and explain in a civil manor why he is wrong to regards subject .

That, apparently, has no effect.

To the mods I apologize if I stepped out of line here but the report to  moderator button is broken  I am just tired of behaviour like the above it has no place in this forum

No apology necessary.

I appreciate your concern, but please try and appreciate this from our point of view: experienceless "experts" who know everything can be extremely exasperating.

Offline pylon

  • Member
  • ****
  • 820
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 110
Re: FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities
« Reply #832 on: October 10, 2009, 07:52:56 »
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/10/07/333174/lockheed-starts-building-new-version-of-the-c-130j.html

Lockheed starts building new version of the C-130J
By Stephen Trimble


Lockheed Martin officially launched production on 5 October of the first C-130 Hercules acquired by the US Air Force to support search and rescue missions since the Vietnam War.

The ceremony inside Lockheed's Marietta production facility also marked the launch of a new C-130 variant tailored for special operations missions, which company officials hope could lead to dozens - if not hundreds - of new orders by domestic and foreign customers for the 55-year-old tactical airlifter.

The USAF plans to acquire 22 new HC/MC-130Js to begin replacing 78 HC-130s flown by search and rescue teams and 37 MC-130s operated by special forces. More orders are expected to follow as the USAF continues to renew the ageing fleet.

 
 © Michael Balter MBAviation-Images

The new design boosts the C-130J's maximum take-off weight to 74,400kg (164,000lb) and the assault landing weight to 64,400kg. The heavier model also includes an advanced wing design that guarantees longer service life, which has become a major issue for the C-130E models that the C-130J replaces.

Lockheed has also adapted the C-130J production process for the new variant. The refuelling receptacle is produced in-line instead of as a post-production modification. That single change eliminates eight months of extra production time, saving $8 million in manufacturing costs per aircraft, Lockheed officials say.

Lockheed has also fitted a forward looking infrared (FLIR) turreted pod - the Raytheon multi-spectral targeting system (MTS-A) - to the airframe structure beneath the flightdeck. The company is investing internal funds to design a retractable turret that could extend the HC/MC-130J's mission radius.

Company officials have also disclosed internal plans to develop a new outer-mould line for the venerable airlifter that can accommodate more equipment for special operations missions. One design concept displayed publicly so far reveals an enlarged nose section and a wider cross-section for the fuselage.

Lockheed is in the midst of a major sales boom for the C-130J programme. The company is doubling annual production from 12 aircraft in 2008 to more than 24 aircraft in 2010. Lockheed will be building five different models of the C-130J simultaneously in 2010, including new HC/MC-130Js and KC-130Js, and C-130J-30s ordered by Canada, Qatar and India.


kc

Offline hauger

  • Member
  • ****
  • 1,380
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 114
Re: FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities
« Reply #833 on: January 28, 2010, 11:11:36 »
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/10/07/333174/lockheed-starts-building-new-version-of-the-c-130j.html

Lockheed has also fitted a forward looking infrared (FLIR) turreted pod - the Raytheon multi-spectral targeting system (MTS-A) - to the airframe structure beneath the flightdeck. The company is investing internal funds to design a retractable turret that could extend the HC/MC-130J's mission radius.

Sweet.  FLIR is a slick toy to have.

I need a bit of education though on how SAR does business with it's aircraft.  Does it need the roughly 50 - 70K payload capacity of the J?  I guess what I'm asking is would using 130's, either H's or J's be somewhat overkill for the role (I know using the H's is easy since we already own a bunch and they will be somewhat freed up soon-ish with the J delivery)?

Online CDN Aviator

  • Milnet.ca Legend
  • *****
  • 122,600
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 14,821
  • BD3D Op
    • Association of Old Crows
Re: FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities
« Reply #834 on: January 28, 2010, 11:16:23 »
That system is NOT a FLIR.......
"Ahh..... F**k it....weapon away !!"

"The only difference between peace and war is where we place our bombs" - General Curtis E. LeMay

Offline hauger

  • Member
  • ****
  • 1,380
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 114
Re: FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities
« Reply #835 on: January 28, 2010, 13:30:32 »
That system is NOT a FLIR.......

Okay, capitalizing the "NOT" shows me you feel awful strong about this.  So if it's not part of a FLIR system, then what is it? 

See, I first read the article, and it said they were fitting the FLIR turreted pod, the ratheon MTS.  I took that to mean that they were fitting, oh, I don't know, a FLIR turreted pod.  When I looked up the multi-spectral system, I found out it in fact does support FLIR (among other imagining tech).  Still, I guess somehow I got that wrong.

So, help me out a bit here and maybe instead of just proclaiming my being incorrect, maybe throw out a bit of education and explain where I went wrong.

Online CDN Aviator

  • Milnet.ca Legend
  • *****
  • 122,600
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 14,821
  • BD3D Op
    • Association of Old Crows
Re: FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities
« Reply #836 on: January 28, 2010, 13:42:13 »
calling it a FLIR is like saying T-Ball is the same as MLB.

The system you refered to is called an EO/IR system as it is much more capable that a FLIR.

A FLIR system operates a camera in the IR spectrum....thats it. I operated the OR-5008 FLIR when we still had it. It was good but very limited.

An EO/IR system usualy incorporates 2 or more cameras ( my MX-20 has 3) , one of which work in IR and the others in the visual spectrum ( and can incorporate filters such as NIR). They also tend to incorporate other tools such as laser pointers/designators, spot trackers, range finders , etc.....

If you read the Raytheon site for the MTS , they refer to it as an EOIR system.

http://www.raytheon.com/capabilities/products/mts/

Quote
Dependable, flexible and easily supported, the MTS will continue to be the world’s most advanced integrated EO/IR system. The MTS is designated as the AN/AAS-52.

Small point it may be but if you called a LAV III a "tank", what responses would you get ?
« Last Edit: January 28, 2010, 13:51:46 by CDN Aviator »
"Ahh..... F**k it....weapon away !!"

"The only difference between peace and war is where we place our bombs" - General Curtis E. LeMay

Offline hauger

  • Member
  • ****
  • 1,380
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 114
Re: FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities
« Reply #837 on: January 28, 2010, 14:31:32 »
Thanks CDN, that was a constructive and informative response.

Calling the AN/AAS-52 though T-ball compared to FLIR's MLB is probably corrent.  The MTS is an EO/IR device, but you know what, that doesn't really mean anything by itself.  EO (Electro-Optical) means visible light.  IR means the whole IR spectrum.  What IR are we talking about here then?  Near spectrum IR is used in NVGs (along with some EO), and produces one type of image.  FLIR uses generally far IR to gather its image.

So what does the AN/AAS-52 do?  Well, Raytheon themselves (the nice guys that make the product) call it a FLIR device in their product sheet (http://www.raytheon.com/capabilities/rtnwcm/groups/sas/documents/content/rtn_sas_ds_an_aas52.pdf).  Actually, they call it an "Advanced FLIR" system. 

So, you're right in at least as far as symantics go, the MTS in this case is not just a FLIR system, but an EO/IR system capable of fusing numerous sensors together into a nice image.  That doesn't mean to say it's not FLIR capable, it seems to be, and it seems to be how Raytheon is selling the kit.

Honestly though, I think we're just arguing stupid points.  The point here is that it's a nice piece of kit that produces useful, nice images to look at.

Online CDN Aviator

  • Milnet.ca Legend
  • *****
  • 122,600
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 14,821
  • BD3D Op
    • Association of Old Crows
Re: FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities
« Reply #838 on: January 28, 2010, 15:37:44 »
 ::)

Back to SAR planes......i like planes.....
"Ahh..... F**k it....weapon away !!"

"The only difference between peace and war is where we place our bombs" - General Curtis E. LeMay

Offline Zoomie

  • Established 1998
  • Mentor
  • Milnet.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 14,682
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 1,880
  • I routinely step in it, but like conflict...
Re: FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities
« Reply #839 on: January 30, 2010, 03:14:46 »
Does it need the roughly 50 - 70K payload capacity of the J? 

FWSAR requires a palletized on/off load capability that can be configured to meet the requirements of the mission at hand.  That being said - there is nothing in the order of that kind of weight requirement for SAR loads.  The Buff SAR loads would have to be hand-bombed on to each aircraft, as we did not have a palletized load.

FWSAR is all about range and speed - our best asset is our ability to find a crash site and send in the orange suits.  EO/IR and an effective method to dispatch jumpers (read ramp) is what we need.

Offline Haletown

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • 10,265
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 704
Re: FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities
« Reply #840 on: January 30, 2010, 09:56:59 »
Does anyone know where to find a current version of the procurement docs for the the FWSAR ?

I am curious to know how much, if any, emphasis is placed on the other general purpose uses for the aircraft other than SAR. 

Or can anyone here provide an answer?

Offline Zoomie

  • Established 1998
  • Mentor
  • Milnet.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 14,682
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 1,880
  • I routinely step in it, but like conflict...
Re: FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities
« Reply #841 on: January 31, 2010, 13:57:50 »
The only other use for current FWSAR aircraft is strategic air lift.  I don't see that changing in the future.  What general purpose ideas did you have in mind?

Offline MCG

  • Directing Staff
  • Milnet.ca Fixture
  • *
  • 57,435
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 7,416
Re: FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities
« Reply #842 on: January 31, 2010, 14:24:04 »
I am curious to know how much, if any, emphasis is placed on the other general purpose uses for the aircraft other than SAR. 
It is all great to include recognition for broader capabilities within procurement selection criteria, but if one does it just for the sake of including recognition for broader capabilities then one may only be committing themselves to paying more for something they will not use.

In the case of FWSAR, if we only buy enough airframes to meet our need in the FWSAR role then any additional millions-billions spent for greater transport or ISR capability will be wasted (because the aircraft will just not be available to do that transport or ISR work).

It might also be worthwhile if we knew the next project would be a light transport aircraft.  In that case, we could give added recognition to any aircraft that met both requirements and include an option to buy X additonal airframes in the future (in this case, X would be the number of light transport airframes required).  But, I don't think we have any such projects waiting in the backrooms.

There is only so much $$$ available to DND.  Just as we cannot afford to sink $$$ into equipment which lacks the capabilities we really need, we also cannot afford to squander $$$ in fancy features we won't be able to use.

Offline SupersonicMax

    is back home.

  • Mentor
  • Milnet.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 38,130
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 1,681
Re: FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities
« Reply #843 on: January 31, 2010, 20:26:44 »
That system is NOT a FLIR.......

The Sniper pod isn't technically ony a FLIR pod, however on my displays, it does say FLIR for the Sniper pod selection.  Even the aircraft tells me it's a FLIR, even though it's not.   ::)

I think it's fair to say that people understand what you mean when you say FLIR pod.
Fellows, pilots keep it up longer

Online CDN Aviator

  • Milnet.ca Legend
  • *****
  • 122,600
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 14,821
  • BD3D Op
    • Association of Old Crows
Re: FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities
« Reply #844 on: January 31, 2010, 20:47:01 »
  Even the aircraft tells me it's a FLIR, even though it's not.   ::)



We also had legacy software that said FLIR in our aircraft. That has since been removed. same with all references to FLIR in the AOIs.
"Ahh..... F**k it....weapon away !!"

"The only difference between peace and war is where we place our bombs" - General Curtis E. LeMay

Offline SupersonicMax

    is back home.

  • Mentor
  • Milnet.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 38,130
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 1,681
Re: FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities
« Reply #845 on: January 31, 2010, 21:33:06 »
This isn't legacy software, but brand spanking new software.
Fellows, pilots keep it up longer

Offline Loachman

  • Army Pilot in Drag
  • Directing Staff
  • Milnet.ca Veteran
  • *
  • 49,112
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 3,350
Re: FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities
« Reply #846 on: February 01, 2010, 00:35:50 »
FLIR is also a manufacturer: http://www.flir.com/CA/

Offline Kirkhill

  • Milnet.ca Fixture
  • *****
  • 40,295
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 6,490
  • Just plain difficult
Re: FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities
« Reply #847 on: March 17, 2010, 09:14:21 »
If Jack Harris wants 15 minute response (let alone 15 minute recovery) everywhere in Canada and its EEZ then he better plan on buying an awful lot of helos, crews and techies.
Over, Under, Around or Through.
Anticipating the triumph of Thomas Reid.

Offline dapaterson

  • Milnet.ca Subscriber
  • Milnet.ca Fixture
  • *
  • 110,210
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 6,360
Re: FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities
« Reply #848 on: March 17, 2010, 09:23:45 »
If Jack Harris wants 15 minute response (let alone 15 minute recovery) everywhere in Canada and its EEZ then he better plan on buying an awful lot of helos, crews and techies.

Depends how you define 15 min response.  If it`s a crew on standby, ready to launch within 15 mins we could do that...

Out of Winnipeg (middle of Canada).  Could be a slight delay in getting to Newfoundland.

On the other hand, overlapping circles of 15 min response time would be prohibitively expensive.


I do like the idea of having the CF ditch SAR responsibility.  It`s not a core military function (other than CSAR, which we don`t do) - but I know CAS would blow a headvalve if he lost that many PYs...
This posting made in accordance with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, section 2(b):
Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication
http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/charter/1.html

Online NFLD Sapper

  • Mentor
  • Milnet.ca Fixture
  • *****
  • 135,722
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 6,543
  • SQN Ops and Trg NCO
Re: FWSAR (CC130H, Buffalo, C27J, V22): Status & Possibilities
« Reply #849 on: March 19, 2010, 11:11:25 »
News Room
 
Canadian fixed-wing search and rescue
BG–10.005 - March 18, 2010


In a country as vast as Canada, the search and rescue environment is complex. The men and women of the Canadian Forces who carry out these life-saving missions require modern and up-to-date equipment.

Fixed-wing search and rescue (FWSAR) is a vital component of this SAR system because it provides the response that is so important in the time period immediately following the occurrence of a distress incident. With the Canadian Forces’ current Buffalo FWSAR aircraft approaching the end of their supportable life spans, acquiring a new aircraft is essential for the Department of National Defence (DND) to perform effective SAR services across the country. It is absolutely critical that the right aircraft be selected because not only the lives of the crews that conduct these operations will depend on it for the next 30 years but also the lives of Canadians in distress.

As a part of the Canada First Defence Strategy, the replacement of Canada's Fixed Wing Search and Rescue (FWSAR) fleet is a high priority for the Government.

ACQUIRING A NEW FWSAR AIRCRAFT

Approximately every 30 years, new aircraft must be acquired to allow dedicated SAR crews to continue providing their essential service. As aircraft age, they reach a point where the cost and effort associated with maintenance increase significantly, resulting in decreased availability. The Hercules and Buffalo aircraft being used in this role today entered service in the mid-1960s. While the addition of the new C-130J Hercules for the Tactical Air Transport mission will allow the retirement of the older CC-130E models and the use of the newer CC-130H models in the interim, the recent life extension initiatives for the Buffalo fleet ends in 2015.

Efforts are underway to acquire a new FWSAR capability to allow the retirement of the Buffalo aircraft as quickly as possible. A FWSAR project office at the Department of National Defence (DND) was established; and, in 2004, a Statement of Requirements (SOR) was drafted. The SOR outlines the technical aspects that an aircraft requires to effectively carry out SAR missions in Canada’s harsh operating environment.

 In June 2006 the Government announced that it planned to acquire Strategic and Tactical Airlift fleets.  The CanadaFirst Defence Strategy, established in 2008, outlines that these prioritized acquisitions are building a solid foundation for the continued modernization and strengthening of the military. Based on a detailed assessment of requirements, this 20-year plan commits to renewing the Forces’ core equipment platforms, which includes FWSAR. 

Canada's CC-177 Globemaster III strategic lift fleet was delivered in 2008, and the delivery of the first CC-130J Hercules tactical lift aircraft is expected to begin in summer 2010. 

In July 2009, in an effort to move forward with the FWSAR procurement, the Government of Canada requested industry’s feedback on the high level considerations for FWSAR requirements, which were detailed during the FWSAR Industry Day. Industry was given 60 days to comment. The submission period concluded on September 15 and DND, Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC), and Industry Canada (IC) reviewed the submissions from industry.  This demonstrated the Government’s commitment to an open dialogue with industry and helped assess the Canadian industrial ability to support the procurement of a new fleet.

Following consultation with the aerospace industry, the government engaged the National Research Council (NRC) to conduct an independent review of the FWSAR SOR.  The final report was received from the NRC in March 2010 and officials from DND, PWGSC, and IC are reviewing the report’s findings and recommendations. The report’s findings, as well as industry’s feedback, will complement the work already done by DND to ensure the best possible solution for Canada’s complex SAR environment. 

THE ENVIRONMENT

Canada is one of the most challenging countries in the world in which to conduct Search and Rescue (SAR) operations. With the world’s second largest land mass surrounded by the longest coastline, the area to be covered is immense: approximately 18 million square kilometres. As shown in Figure 1, the Canadian SAR region far exceeds that of all Western European countries combined. The geography Canadian SAR Region ranges from the Rocky Mountain peaks, to vast territorial waters, to Arctic tundra, most of which is sparsely populated with little infrastructure. Weather can be extreme and temperatures vary from -50C to +40C and beyond. All of which place enormous demands on the people and equipment that must work in this environment. In terms of SAR, these demands are unique to Canada.



Figure 1. Comparison of Canada’s SAR Area of Responsibility to Western Europe.

In 1947, the Department of National Defence (DND) was assigned primary federal responsibility for providing aeronautical SAR services across Canada. The aeronautical SAR service provided by the Canadian Forces is an essential component of the overall National SAR Program, which includes resources contributed by the Canadian Coast Guard, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, provincial and municipal police forces, the Civil Air Search and Rescue Association (CASARA), and many others.

Canada’s vast area is divided into three Search and Rescue Regions (SRR) as shown in Figure 1, with Joint Rescue Coordination Centres (JRCC) located in Halifax, NS; Trenton, ON; and Victoria BC. The JRCCs are staffed by Canadian Coast Guard and Canadian Forces’ personnel who can call upon any SAR resources in their area to respond to incidents of distress 24 hours/day, 7 days/week, 365 days/year. Each year, JRCCs handle an average of 8,000 air and marine SAR cases. In 2008, the JRCC handled 9,097 SAR cases across Canada. On average, Canadian Forces SAR aircraft conduct over 1,000 missions per year.

Canadian Forces primary SAR crews and aircraft are based in:

Gander, NL (Cormorant helicopters);

Greenwood, NS (Cormorant helicopters and Hercules fixed-wing aircraft);

Trenton, ON (Griffon helicopters and Hercules fixed-wing aircraft);

Winnipeg, MB (Hercules fixed-wing aircraft); and

Comox, BC (Cormorant helicopters and Buffalo fixed-wing aircraft).

However, any Canadian Forces aircraft can be called upon to conduct SAR operations when required. Particularly, Griffon helicopters based in Goose Bay, NL; Bagotville, QC; and Cold Lake, AB, often conduct SAR missions in addition to their primary role. The Canadian Forces Twin Otter aircraft fleet based in Yellowknife, NWT is often similarly tasked as a secondary FWSAR resource. As shown in Figure 2, the current mix of helicopter and fixed-wing SAR aircraft are strategically located to maximize the level of SAR service where it is needed most, given the resources and base locations across Canada.



Figure 2. Location of Primary Canadian Forces SAR Aircraft and Distribution of Incidents involving FWSAR Response from 1998 to 2001. (ORD Technical Report TR 2005/03)

FWSAR AIRCRAFT WITHIN THE SAR SYSTEM

The overall SAR solution for the Canadian Forces involves the ability to respond rapidly to SAR incidents near and far, and to provide both immediate assistance and rescue for all possible SAR events. The combination of helicopters and fixed-wing SAR aircraft provide a rapid and effective SAR solution, as the unique attributes of each play a critical role. The FWSAR aircraft is the first to arrive on-scene and provide immediate assistance by dispatching life-saving SAR technicians and/or equipment to persons in distress thus requiring superior speed, range and cargo capacity. In the long range scenarios, the helicopter arrives later to extract the distress victims along with the SAR technicians. Both aircraft types are essential for providing a rapid and effective SAR service to a large area.

CANADA’S INDUSTRIAL AND REGIONAL BENEFITS (IRB) POLICY

Canada’s Industrial and Regional Benefits (IRB) requirements for procurements such as FWSAR are applied in a manner that does not affect the Department of National Defence’s operational requirements.
The IRB Policy is an important element of the Government of Canada’s overall procurement process for major defence and security purchases. This policy enables the Government of Canada to leverage major investments in military equipment to encourage long-term industrial development and significant economic activity here in Canada.

Established in 1986, the Policy ensures that prime contractors undertake high quality and advanced technology business activities in Canada, typically in amounts equal to 100 percent of the contract value. Canada’s IRB Policy is firmly in line with over 150 industrialized countries around the world that implement similar industrial participation programs.

Industry Canada is responsible for the administration of the IRB Policy, and is the IRB Authority. Industry Canada works in partnership on procurement projects with Public Works and Government Services Canada, which oversees the procurement process, and with the Department of National Defence, which establishes the technical requirements. Industry Canada consults with and conducts evaluations of IRB proposals along with the Regional Development Agencies.

IRB OBJECTIVES

A key objective of Government of Canada procurement is to ensure that the right goods and services are purchased at the best possible price for the taxpayer. Sometimes, Canadian firms meet the procurement requirements and provide significant Canadian content in their goods or services. Other times, global firms provide goods and services that combine high-value Canadian content with world-class items sourced outside of Canada.

The IRB Policy does not dictate where the goods and services are purchased. Instead, it allows for the best available balance between quality and value for money, while ensuring that an equivalent amount of high-value economic stimulus is injected into the Canadian economy. IRBs help ensure that the Canadian economy in all regions benefits from procurement, regardless of the final outcome of the procurement process and which company wins the contract.

The IRB Policy requires prime contractors to select their Canadian partners based on what makes the best business sense, with the goal of generating long-term, sustainable business relationships in Canada. These strategic relationships stimulate the Canadian economy while helping to ensure a more competitive Canadian industry. The long-term focus of the IRB Policy provides Canadian companies with an opportunity to develop and apply their own strengths and competitive solutions and to take advantage of real business opportunities that will last years beyond the initial IRB commitment.

IRB REQUIREMENTS

During the bidding process for a project with IRB requirements, bidders must submit an IRB proposal as part of the overall bid. The IRB proposal is a specific plan that outlines how the bidder plans to engage with Canadian companies over the life of the contract. The IRB proposal responds to several key requirements, such as providing plans for regional and small business participation, along with specifically identifying business activities being proposed. A team, which includes representation from the Regional Development Agencies, is led by Industry Canada to evaluate each IRB proposal and determine whether it satisfies the requirements of the IRB Policy.

The IRB Policy recognizes both “direct” and “indirect” types of business activities. Direct IRBs are goods, services or investments that relate directly to the item being procured by Canada under the contract. Indirect IRBs are goods, services or investments that relate to the contractor’s other product or business lines. Each IRB activity must meet established eligibility criteria and is measured for its Canadian content value (i.e., Canadian labour and materials).

The Government of Canada does not force winning bidders to do business with specific Canadian companies. The government asks them to identify and undertake high-value business opportunities in Canada that make good business sense to all parties involved.

SUSTAINABLE, LONG-TERM BENEFITS

The IRB Policy benefits the Canadian economy by:

securing major investments in the Canadian economy

providing the incentive for contractors to partner with Canadian companies

increasing Canadian industrial competitiveness, through improved market access of advanced-technology sectors

facilitating the entry of Canadian firms in the global supply chains of major international corporations

developing and maintaining a capacity in Canada to deliver long-term equipment support to the Canadian Forces

promoting growth of Canada’s small and medium-sized enterprises and the development of regional industrial capacity

For more information on Canada’s IRB Policy and a description of ongoing and future federal procurements subject to the IRB Policy, please visit www.ic.gc.ca/irb.

CHIMO!
First in, Last out
Sappers Lead the Way

Just tell your wife she owes your life to some Muddy Old Engineer,
Some dusty, crusty, croaking, joking Muddy Old Engineer
#75 | Rank: 114 | Cbt Exp: 1,525,030 | Msns: 1,886