Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
Search's Fallen Comrades

They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old

Online Users
546 Guests, 3 Users
fiddlehead, kkwd, rugeleytar
Total Members: 61,063
Total Posts: 1,393,772
Total Topics: 71,424
Total Categories: 13
Total Boards: 121
Twitter Feed
Recent Topics
[Canadian Politics] The Next Conservative Leader by Altair Today at 03:27:36
[Current Operations] Op ARTEMIS: Counter-terr/secur @ sea (merged) by jmt18325 Today at 01:59:38
[Recruiting] Infantry by Kat Stevens Today at 01:19:51
[RMC, CMR, ROTP] University Training Plan NCM (UTPNCM)-NCM to Officer [MERGED] by misratah500 Today at 00:44:00
[Radio Chatter] U.S. Politics 2017 (split fm US Election: 2016) by Dimsum Today at 00:29:28
[Ships & Vessels] RCN vs Giant Inflatable Yellow Rubber Duck by kratz Yesterday at 23:26:30
[Recruiting] Comparing the job of Officer vs NCM [MERGED] by Infant_Tree Yesterday at 23:25:04
[Recruiting] Selection Dates by jollibee Yesterday at 23:10:13
[Personal Stories] UK Applicant by Loachman Yesterday at 22:46:17
[The Recruiting Process] Application Process Samples by EpicBeardedMan Yesterday at 21:26:35
[US Military] USAF Woes by MarkOttawa Yesterday at 21:21:20
[Land Vehicles] Logistic Vehicle Modernization Project - Replacing everything from LUVW to SHLVW by Chris Pook Yesterday at 20:44:15
[Enrollment Medical] Being knocked unconscious? by PMedMoe Yesterday at 20:43:01
[Ships & Vessels] Canadian Surface Combatant RFQ by Chris Pook Yesterday at 20:41:58
[The Recruiting Process] Credit Check Superthread- Merged Topics by Paulyduch Yesterday at 19:13:51 Administration

xx (Suggestion) Website template/design

May 28, 2017, 20:23:24 by PongoCadet

Not sure if this is the right place for this, or this is a sensible suggestion.

I'm not sure how the website is hosted, run or anything like that, I'm not trying to tread on the work or the staff, donators or anyone involved with this site or disrespect the efforts etc.

The website does seem to be of a outdated style, for whatever reason, and there are cheap and feasible ways to update this, for example XenForo, which would un-doubt ably be a major improvement and upgrade over the current setup, allowing for much better user experience, upkeep and so on.

There are cheaper softwares out there if this is too pricey.

Please bare in mind this is just a suggestion and I'm in no way slating or criticising the current setup, just thought I might bring it up is all. Obviously I understand there are reasons why the site has to remain as it is, and I'm not going to argue with it, its the owner's site afterall!
8 comments News

clip 27 May 2017: "Canadian frigate Ottawa arrives in Shanghai for China visit"

May 27, 2017, 07:06:44 by
Nothing from the RCN info-machine on this yet, but here's what CHN's military info-machine has to say ...
Canadian Navy's frigate HMCS Ottawa (341) arrived at the Yangtze naval harbor in Shanghai on May 26 to begin a seven-day friendly visit to Shanghai.

This is the third time for Shanghai to welcome the Ottawa and the eighth time for Canadian naval warships to visit Shanghai.

Rear-Admiral Art McDonald, commander of Maritime Forces Pacific of the Royal Canadian Navy (RCN), arrived in Shanghai on May 25 for this visit.

The East China Sea Fleet of the PLA Navy held a welcome ceremony at the harbor for the visiting Canadian frigate. Rear Admiral Wang Jianxun, commander of a naval base under the East China Sea Fleet, met with Rear Admiral McDonald and Commander Sylvain Belair, captain of the Ottawa. The Chinese side held a welcoming reception on Friday evening for the visiting Canadian frigate.

Art McDonald will pay official calls on Shanghai Municipal Government leaders. Officers and soldiers of the two navies will visit each other's warships and have friendly basketball games. The Canadian side will hold a deck reception on the Ottawa.

After wrapping up the visit to Shanghai, HMCS Ottawa will conduct a joint drill of communication and fleet maneuver with the guided-missile frigate Xuzhou of the PLA Navy in a water of the East China Sea.
Caption to attached  photo:
Canadian Navy's Frigate HMCS Ottawa (341) arrives at a pier of the Yangtze River in Shanghai, east China, May 26, for a 7-day friendly port visit. Frigate HMCS Ottawa (341) is one of the 12 Canadian-built Halifax-class multi-role patrol frigates which are considered the backbone of the Royal Canadian Navy (RCN). The frigate was originally designed for anti-submarine warfare and anti-surface warfare, primarily in the open ocean environment. ( by Wang Guixian)
0 comments | Write Comment

xx Tax Exemption for Salaries of Deployed Canadian Armed Forces Personnel and Polic

May 18, 2017, 15:03:18 by dangerboy
Good news for some pers

News Release
From National Defence

May 18 2017 – Ottawa, ON – Government of Canada

Recognizing the commitment and sacrifice that Canadian Armed Forces members - and their families - make for Canada when a member deploys abroad, Defence Minister Harjit S. Sajjan, Finance Minister Bill Morneau, and Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale today announced the Government’s intention to exempt the military salaries of all Canadian Armed Forces personnel deployed on named international operations from federal income taxes, up to and including the pay level of Lieutenant-Colonel.

This tax relief would also apply to police officers deployed on international operational missions.

This measure is an important part of a broader package of administrative changes and new measures included in Canada’s new Defence Policy, which will improve the way the Government of Canada treats our military personnel. Canada’s new Defence Policy will be made public on June 7, 2017.

These changes ensure that Canadian Armed Forces personnel and police officers deployed on designated international missions are recognized for their sacrifice and that of their family.

“When our women and men in uniform deploy internationally, they and their families make great sacrifices on our behalf. Military families are the strength behind the uniform and we must do more to acknowledge that our people are our most important asset. The Government of Canada will recognize their sacrifices with these important tax relief measures.”

—    Harjit S. Sajjan, Defence Minister
“I am very pleased to provide further recognition of the special contribution that Canadian Armed Forces members and police officers make to international peace and stability while serving their country abroad.”

—    Bill Morneau, Minister of Finance
“The government is proud of the important work our police do abroad to support peace and stability in parts of the world that badly need both. We will provide further recognition of their tireless work by providing additional tax relief when they are deployed abroad.”

—    Ralph Goodale, Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness
Quick Facts
While the number of CAF personnel on deployed operations changes from day-to-day, there are currently approximately 1,450 Canadian Armed Forces personnel deployed on international military operations.

The Government intends to make this measure retroactive to January 1, 2017. These changes will not affect the assessment and awarding of existing hardship and risk allowances earned by Canadian Armed Forces personnel deployed abroad.

Related Products
Notice of Ways and Means Motion
Backgrounder: Tax Relief for Canadian Armed Forces Personnel and Police Officers
Jordan Owens
Press Secretary
Office of the Minister of National Defence
Phone: 613-996-3100

Annie Donolo
Press Secretary
Office of the Minister of Finance
Phone: 613-769-7187

Scott Bardsley
Office of the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness
Phone: 613-998-5681

Media Relations
Department of National Defence
Phone: 613-996-2353
Toll-Free: 1-866-377-0811

Media Relations
Department of Finance
Phone: 613-369-4000

19 comments | Write Comment

xx 12-13 May 2017: "Dozens of countries hit by huge cyberextortion attack"

May 13, 2017, 11:29:46 by
Holy crap!
Dozens of countries were hit with a huge cyberextortion attack Friday that locked up computers and held users' files for ransom at a multitude of hospitals, companies and government agencies.

It was believed to the biggest attack of its kind ever recorded.

The malicious software behind the onslaught appeared to exploit a vulnerability in Microsoft Windows that was supposedly identified by the National Security Agency for its own intelligence-gathering purposes and was later leaked to the internet.

Britain's national health service fell victim, its hospitals forced to close wards and emergency rooms and turn away patients. Russia appeared to be the hardest hit, according to security experts, with the country's Interior Ministry confirming it was struck.

All told, several cybersecurity firms said they had identified the malicious software, which so far has been responsible for tens of thousands of attacks, in more than 60 countries. That includes the United States, although its effects there didn't appear to be widespread, at least initially.

The attack infected computers with what is known as "ransomware" — software that locks up the user's data and flashes a message demanding payment to release it. In the U.S., FedEx reported that its Windows computers were "experiencing interference" from malware, but wouldn't say if it had been hit by ransomware.

Mikko Hypponen, chief research officer at the Helsinki-based cybersecurity company F-Secure, called the attack "the biggest ransomware outbreak in history." ...
More via Google News here.
2 comments | Write Comment

xx NATO nations being asked to send troops back to Afghanistan.

May 12, 2017, 13:45:15 by Altair

LONDON (Reuters) - NATO is assessing a request from the alliance's military authorities to send more troops to Afghanistan and will make a decision on the scale and scope of the mission within weeks, Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said on Wednesday.
The request for what Stoltenberg said was "about a few thousand" more troops reflects the West's alarm about the worsening security situation in Afghanistan, territorial gains by Taliban militants and military and civilian casualties.
"We are now assessing that request. We will make decisions on the scale and scope of the mission within weeks but this is not about returning back to a combat operation in Afghanistan," he said after meeting British Prime Minister Theresa May.
Reuters reported in late April that U.S. President Donald Trump's administration was weighing sending between 3,000 and 5,000 U.S. and coalition troops to Afghanistan.
NATO already has some 13,450 troops in Afghanistan, including about 6,900 U.S. military personnel, who are training the Afghan armed forces to eventually take over the country's defense and security.
In addition, the United States has about 1,500 more troops in a parallel mission, part of a counter-terrorism unit that mostly targets pockets of al Qaeda and Islamic State fighters.
Stoltenberg stressed that any new NATO arrivals would not be in a combat role. "It will continue to be a train, assist and advise operation," he said of the so-called Resolute Support mission that was launched in January 2015 and signaled the end of an official combat role for NATO troops in Afghanistan.
A decision could be taken by NATO defense ministers in June, according to an alliance official. The NATO leaders summit in Brussels on May 25 was probably too soon, the official said.

Almost 16 years since the United States tried to topple Afghanistan's Taliban, who had harbored al Qaeda militants behind attacks on New York and Washington, the West remains entangled in an effort to stabilize a country facing resurgent rebels.
Facing public fatigue at the long-running conflict, the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation has sought to progressively reduce its presence in the country by building up the country's armed forces, notably creating an Afghan air force.
However, loss of territory to Taliban and Islamic militants, a rise in civilian casualties and a fall in the number of Afghan security forces have led the U.S. administration under Trump to review Afghanistan policy.
Over the past 18 months, Taliban insurgents have twice succeeded in seizing the northern town center of Kunduz for brief periods and the latest fighting underscores the challenge Afghan forces face to quell the insurgency.
According to the United Nations, 583,000 people fled their homes due to conflict in 2016, the highest number of displacements since records began in 2008.
U.S. National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster visited Kabul in April to assess the situation, days after the U.S. military dropped one of the largest conventional weapons ever used in combat during an operation against Islamic State militants in eastern Afghanistan.
"I strongly believe that the best answer we have to terrorism, the best weapon against terrorism, is to train local forces to fight terrorism, to stabilize their own country," Stoltenberg said.

Any increase of several thousand troops would leave U.S. forces in Afghanistan well below their peak of more than 100,000 troops in 2011, when Washington was under huge domestic political pressure to draw down the costly operation.
Some U.S. officials told Reuters they questioned the benefit of sending more troops to Afghanistan because any politically palatable number would not be enough to turn the tide, much less create stability and security. To date, more than 2,300 Americans have been killed and over 17,000 wounded.
For now, deliberations include giving more authorities to forces on the ground. This could allow U.S. advisers to work with Afghan troops below the corps level, potentially putting them closer to fighting, a U.S. official said.
Stoltenberg said NATO trainers could also do more.
"We are now looking into requests regarding some areas like more education, for the military academies, but also training special operation forces and air forces," he said.

Anyone interested?
12 comments | Write Comment
Military Quote
Military Word Of The Day
foreign object damage

» Download the iPhone/iPad Military Terms app! «

Today in Military History

May 30





» Download the iPhone/iPad Military History app! «

Advertising's Supporters

Subscriber Status Board